Article 651-2 of Commercial Act: Effects of Questions in Writing
Article 651-2 (Effects of Questions in Writing) Any fact about which the insurer asks in writing shall be presumed to be material. THE High-quality & Good Contents
Article 648 of Commercial Act: Requests for Return of Premiums upon Nullification of Insurance Contracts
Article 648 (Requests for Return of Premiums upon Nullification of Insurance Contracts)
Where an insurance contract becomes invalid in whole or in part, if a policyholder and the insured have acted in good faith and without gross negligence, they can demand a return of the insurance premium, in whole or in part. The same shall also apply where the policyholder and the beneficiary have acted in good faith and without gross negligence.
THE High-quality & Good Contents
[Original]
제648조(보험계약의 무효로 인한 보험료반환청구)
보험계약의 전부 또는 일부가 무효인 경우에 보험계약자와 피보험자가 선의이며 중대한 과실이 없는 때에는 보험자에 대하여 보험료의 전부 또는 일부의 반환을 청구할 수 있다. 보험계약자와 보험수익자가 선의이며 중대한 과실이 없는 때에도 같다.
THE 수준 높고 좋은 글
[Attorney's Notes] The extinctive prescription of a claim for return of premiums becomes complete if not exercised for a period of three years. Therefore exercise of the right to claim return of premiums is barred by expiration of statute of limitations, if not exercised for three years.
Where an insurance contract becomes invalid in whole or in part, if a policyholder and the insured have acted in good faith and without gross negligence, they can demand a return of the insurance premium, in whole or in part. The same shall also apply where the policyholder and the beneficiary have acted in good faith and without gross negligence.
THE High-quality & Good Contents
[Original]
제648조(보험계약의 무효로 인한 보험료반환청구)
보험계약의 전부 또는 일부가 무효인 경우에 보험계약자와 피보험자가 선의이며 중대한 과실이 없는 때에는 보험자에 대하여 보험료의 전부 또는 일부의 반환을 청구할 수 있다. 보험계약자와 보험수익자가 선의이며 중대한 과실이 없는 때에도 같다.
THE 수준 높고 좋은 글
[Attorney's Notes] The extinctive prescription of a claim for return of premiums becomes complete if not exercised for a period of three years. Therefore exercise of the right to claim return of premiums is barred by expiration of statute of limitations, if not exercised for three years.
Popular posts from this blog
Article 651-2 of Commercial Act: Effects of Questions in Writing
Article 651-2 (Effects of Questions in Writing) Any fact about which the insurer asks in writing shall be presumed to be material. THE High-quality & Good Contents
Article 649 of Commercial Act: Voluntary Termination of Contracts Prior to Occurrence of Perils Insured against
Article 649 (Voluntary Termination of Contracts Prior to Occurrence of Perils Insured against) (1) A policyholder may terminate a contract in whole or in part at any time before a peril insured against occurs: Provided, That in cases of an insurance contract prescribed in Article 639, the policyholder shall not terminate the contract without obtaining the consent of the third party or carrying the insurance policy with him/her. (2) In cases of an insurance policy under which the insured amount is not reduced notwithstanding that the insurer has covered the peril insured against, the policyholder may terminate the insurance contract even after the occurrence of the peril insured against. (3) In cases falling under paragraph (1), unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the policyholder may demand the return of any unearned premium. THE High-quality & Good Contents
The method of a third person's written consent which is a requirement for validity of life insurance contract which covers the death of a third person
Supreme Court Judgment 2004Da56677 Delivered on September 22, 2006[Insurance Proceeds] [Main Issues] [1] The method of a third person's written consent which is a requirement for validity of life insurance contract which covers the death of a third person as an insured event [2] Whether the insured's approval of the life insurance contract which covers the death of a third person as an insured event renders the insurance contract valid, where the insurance contract had been concluded without written consent of the insured (negative) [3] The case holding that it does not violate the principle of trust and good faith for the insurer to argue the nullity of the life insurance contract which covers the death of a third person as an insured event where there was no written consent of the insured, even in the case where the insurer has been receiving the premium for years or has paid the hospitalization payment following the life insurance contract [Summary of Decision] [1]
Comments
Post a Comment