Article 650-2 of Commercial Act: Reinstatement of Insurance Contracts

-
Article 650-2 (Reinstatement of Insurance Contracts)  

Where an insurance contract is terminated under Article 650 (2), and no refund for termination is paid, a policyholder may demand a reinstatement of a contract by paying to the insurer delayed premiums, together with the agreed interest within a specified period. The provisions of Article 638-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to this case.


THE High-quality & Good Contents



[Original]

제650조의2(보험계약의 부활)
제650조 제2항에 따라 보험계약이 해지되고 해지환급금이 지급되지 아니한 경우에 보험계약자는 일정한 기간 내에 연체보험료에 약정이자를 붙여 보험자에게 지급하고 그 계약의 부활을 청구할 수 있다. 제638조의2의 규정은 이 경우에 준용한다


THE 수준 높고 좋은 글

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Article 649 of Commercial Act: Voluntary Termination of Contracts Prior to Occurrence of Perils Insured against

-
Image
Article 649 (Voluntary Termination of Contracts Prior to Occurrence of Perils Insured against)  (1)  A policyholder may terminate a contract in whole or in part at any time before a peril insured against occurs: Provided, That in cases of an insurance contract prescribed in Article 639, the policyholder shall not terminate the contract without obtaining the consent of the third party or carrying the insurance policy with him/her. (2)  In cases of an insurance policy under which the insured amount is not reduced notwithstanding that the insurer has covered the peril insured against, the policyholder may terminate the insurance contract even after the occurrence of the peril insured against. (3)  In cases falling under paragraph (1), unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the policyholder may demand the return of any unearned premium. THE High-quality & Good Contents
Read more

The method of a third person's written consent which is a requirement for validity of life insurance contract which covers the death of a third person

-
Image
Supreme Court Judgment 2004Da56677 Delivered on September 22, 2006[Insurance Proceeds] [Main Issues] [1]  The method of a third person's written consent which is a requirement for validity of life insurance contract which covers the death of a third person as an insured event [2]  Whether the insured's approval of the life insurance contract which covers the death of a third person as an insured event renders the insurance contract valid, where the insurance contract had been concluded without written consent of the insured (negative) [3] The case holding that it does not violate the principle of trust and good faith for the insurer to argue the nullity of the life insurance contract which covers the death of a third person as an insured event where there was no written consent of the insured, even in the case where the insurer has been receiving the premium for years or has paid the hospitalization payment following the life insurance contract [Summary of Decision] [1]
Read more